Brexit Supreme Court Hearing Sees Pro-Israel Leprechaun Dance Outside

The demonstrators were few but colourful.
LOADINGERROR LOADING

A man dressed as a pro-Brexit, pro-Israel leprechaun danced outside the Supreme Court today to tell us Nigel Farage was sent by Jesus to save us from the Third World War.

The bare-legged campaigner performed a sprightly Irish jig as judges debated one of the most serious constitutional cases in British history, thereby eliminating the need for anyone to make up any kind of joke about the proceedings.

The performer’s exact view on whether the Government could use Royal Prerogative to leave the EU was unclear.

It was clear however that he thinks Farage was “sent by Christ to get Britain out of Europe and fulfil bible prophecy”.

Right now outside the Supreme Court pic.twitter.com/Z0qrT5o6tZ

— Jordan Ryan (@jordanjryan) December 5, 2016

Scenes outside the Supreme Court: there's a chap dancing a Brexit jig pic.twitter.com/8EOqlofker

— Sebastian Payne (@SebastianEPayne) December 5, 2016

His other signs made it clear he feels Britain will be on the same side as Israel in an impending Third World War, whereas the rest of Europe will fight on the opposing side.

His views on Irish culture remain undeclared. People believed the man was Neil Horan, a defrocked Irish Catholic priest who has previously disrupted major events like the Grand Prix and the Olympics and appeared on Britain’s Got Talent.

He was called a “sex elf” in one tweet that adapted Theresa May’s mantra on Brexit.

Brexit means Sex Elf. https://t.co/YgcPMoEd68

— barney farmer (@barneyfarmer) December 5, 2016

Inside the Supreme Court, the Government’s lawyer was on his feet, arguing why Article 50 can be triggered without a vote in parliament.

Farage’s relationship with Christ or the likelihood of the Third World War are not expected to come up in legal arguments.

The pro-Brexit leprechaun was opposed by a double decker bus full of people dressed as judges, who were the most colourful of the pro-Remain demonstrators.

Pro-Remain protestors dressed as judges
Pro-Remain protestors dressed as judges
Kirsty Wigglesworth/AP

There were more conventional protestors condemning the judges but it was unlikely they numbered 100,000 - the number Farage had originally pledged to march to Parliament Square before deciding not to.

Pro-Brexit Protestors decry the 'Establishment stitch up'
Pro-Brexit Protestors decry the 'Establishment stitch up'
Frank Augstein/AP

Protest numbers are always controversial but it was fairly clear the numbers were not in six figures.

So difficult to estimate the size of this protest outside the Supreme Court. Some say 100,000, others claim it's a bit smaller than that. pic.twitter.com/rME2MRaK0t

— Tom Hamilton (@thhamilton) December 5, 2016

The size of the protest outside the Supreme Court suggests if Article 50 is delayed there will be some stern words on the streets pic.twitter.com/JMIk5k6hfB

— Will Black (@WillBlackWriter) December 5, 2016

The first day of the hearing was less dramatic than journalists would have liked.

Other journalists tried to sum up the Government’s case - that it didn’t need parliament’s permission to leave the EU - in terms readers might prefer to the detail of law.

government's Supreme Court appeal argument #Article50 pic.twitter.com/ftmT21Xk6u

— Esther Webber (@estwebber) December 5, 2016

Another journalist embraced the rage for “Post Truth” politics with his thread of tweets commentating on the proceedings.

If you're not watching the #SupremeCourt livestream right now, the judges are all talking about how they prefer croissants to a full english

— Rupert Myers (@RupertMyers) December 5, 2016

With all 11 judges on the Supreme Court sitting for the first time, comedian David Schneider speculated about their tactics.

Supreme Court expected to go with a 4-3-2-1 formation, with Neuberger up front and Hodge sitting just in front of the back four. pic.twitter.com/fVnwsEycjW

— David Schneider (@davidschneider) December 5, 2016

The hearing, probably the highest profile in the court’s history, was live-streamed, the judges felt the glare of public attention - one judge more than others.

I love Lord Sumption's hair. Looks like a Regency wig the morning after a wild night out

— Michael Deacon (@MichaelPDeacon) December 5, 2016

Lord Sumption is blatantly a wizard tho isn't he pic.twitter.com/TtRErJuIoY

— Esther Webber (@estwebber) December 5, 2016

Despite Lord Sumption’s wizardry, The Supreme Court’s verdict is not due until January.

Close

What's Hot