Robert Mugabe's Appointment As Goodwill Ambassador For UN's WHO Causes Shock And Outrage

'It is an insult'.

The decision to make Zimbabwe’s controversial president Robert Mugabe a goodwill ambassador for the UN’s World Health Organisation is “surprising and disappointing”, Downing Street has said.

Mugabe, who is accused of human rights abuses and ruining his country’s economy in his 37 years in power, was announced as the WHO’s ambassador for non-communicable diseases in Africa.

It triggered outrage from human rights advocates and Mugabe’s opponents in Zimbabwe, in part because of how the country’s healthcare system has collapsed under his leadership.

Open Image Modal
Robert Mugabe was appointed a WHO ambassador despite standing accused of 'trashing' his own country's health system
Foto24 via Getty Images

Many hospitals have run out of supplies and doctors and nurses routinely go unpaid.

“The Zimbabwe health delivery system is in a shambolic state. It is an insult,” a spokesman for the main opposition party said.

“Mugabe trashed our health delivery system. He and his family go outside of the country for treatment in Singapore after he allowed our public hospitals to collapse.”

A spokesperson for Number 10 said Mugabe’s appointment was “surprising and disappointing, particularly in light of the current US and EU sanctions against him”.

They added: “Although Mugabe will not have an executive role, his appointment risks overshadowing the work undertaken globally by the WHO on Non-Communicable Diseases.”

Open Image Modal
Zimbabwean doctors and nurses hold placards during a demonstration over the deteriorating health system, outside Parirenyatwa group of hospitals in Harare November 18, 2008
Philimon Bulawayo / Reuters

MP Tom Tugendhat, who chairs the Foreign Affairs Committee, said Mugabe’s “version of goodwill is corruption, murder, and dictatorship”.

He told Sky News: “He has caused famine in one of the most productive lands in the world. It’s hard to see how this aligns with the values the WHO purports to hold.

“There are many other excellent people across the continent of Africa who have done so much for others it is wrong that one of history’s greatest thieves should be so honoured.”

Open Image Modal
Police surround an activist lying on the ground at Harare Central Police Station during a protest in August, 2016 amid anti-government marches in Zimbabwe
JEKESAI NJIKIZANA via Getty Images

 

Human Rights Watch (HRW) has said Mugabe “has intensified repression against thousands of people who peacefully protest human rights violations and the deteriorating economic situation”.

It adds police in Zimbabwe “use excessive force to crush dissent” and “widespread impunity for abuses by the police and state security agents remains”.

Iain Levine, deputy executive director for programmes at HRW, tweeted Mugabe’s “appalling” human rights record meant his appointment “embarrasses” the WHO and its director-general, Dr Tedros Adhanom.

Adhanom, a former Ethiopian foreign minister, said Zimbabwe was “a country that places universal health coverage and health promotion at the centre of its policies to provide health care to all”.

A WHO spokesman said the appointment was part of Adhanom’s “determination to build a global movement to promote high-level political leadership for health”.

Mugabe, 93, has made regular trips abroad for treatment this year.

Hillel Neuer, executive director of the Geneva-based group UN Watch, criticised the choice by the WHO, a UN agency. “The government of RobertMugabe has brutalised human rights activists, crushed democracy dissidents, and turned the breadbasket of Africa — and its health system — into a basket-case.

“The notion that the UN should now spin this country as a great supporter of health is, frankly, sickening,”