Older mothers are constantly told what the risks are of having babies later on in life, so here's a bright spot: if you have kids naturally at an older age, you'll live longer than those who have them in their 20s.
Beneficial genetic variants that allow women to remain fertile may be the explanation, scientists believe.
The study found that women who had their last child after the age of 33 were twice as likely to celebrate their 95th birthday than those who gave birth for the last time by 29.
Lead researcher Dr Thomas Perls, from Boston University Medical Center in the US, said: "Of course this does not mean women should wait to have children at older ages in order to improve their own chances of living longer.
"The age at last childbirth can be a rate of ageing indicator. The natural ability to have a child at an older age likely indicates that a woman's reproductive system is ageing slowly, and therefore so is the rest of her body."
Researchers analysed data from the Long Life Family Study (LLFS), a social and genetic investigation of 551 families containing many exceptionally long-living members.
The scientists determined the ages at which 462 women had their last child, and how long those women lived to be.
SEE ALSO:
Kids TV Programmes - Friend or Foe? The Love-Hate Relationship Between Parents and Kids TV
What Happens When You Fake Your First Period With Nail Polish
The findings, published in Menopause: The Journal of the North American Menopause Society, indicate that women may be the driving force behind the evolution of genetic variants that slow ageing.
"If a woman has those variants, she is able to reproduce and bear children for a longer period of time, increasing her chances of passing down those genes to the next generation," said Prof Perls.
"This possibility may be a clue as to why out of people that live to 100, 85% of them are women lwhile only 15% are men."