“Good morning,” said Theresa May with a weary smile, as she convened a press briefing just after midnight Brussels time. For the EU27, it was certainly a guten Morgen/bonjour/goedemorgen, as they used their collective strength to dictate the terms of the UK’s Brexit timetable. For May, it was another bad night at the poker table as her own June 30 deadline for extended EU membership was torn up before her very eyes. There are two new dates instead: if you get your deal through Parliament you can stay until May 22; if you don’t, you will have to decide by April 12 to hold Euro elections and face a much longer limbo. Nearly three years after the Brexit referendum, Brussels is the one ‘taking back control’.
May’s premiership has been characterised by serial humiliations at the hands of others and one can argue this was just yet another to add to the long list. But many inside and outside her party now think no one makes a fool out of Theresa May better than Theresa May herself. Her personal and political flaws were brutally exposed once more yesterday as she was left literally outside the room, waiting for the EU’s orders. That characteristic mix of bluff, bluster and blancmange had left European leaders so unimpressed they decided to seize the agenda themselves.
As she was grilled for 90 long minutes, May had repeatedly refused to offer any Plan B, to explain the rationale for her June deadline or to make clear if she really was ready for no-deal. Of course your opponents are never going to give you a rave review (though Luxembourg PM Xavier Bettel told Today: “Theresa did the best possible job, she was a tough lady”). But it was all too plausible when the BBC’s Katya Adler reported the PM ‘didn’t perform very well’ and ‘didn’t add anything new to the debate’. Welcome to our world, many British MPs would have yelled.
Both the FT and Guardian picked up fresh signals yesterday that May really is ready to go down the no-deal route (as revealed by HuffPost in February). Still, when asked directly about this last night, she left open the prospect of a longer delay rather than a no-deal. “We need to work with the House to decide how to proceed if we don’t get the deal through,” the PM said. As I pointed out yesterday, May can’t even get a threatened resignation right, and it’s far from clear in Brussels or London if she really would step aside rather than agree a long extension if her deal fails a third time.
Of course, it’s worth pointing out that as much as the EU defended its own position (and avoided a messy emergency summit of its own next week), its ‘flextension’ does offer May a final lifeline to sell her deal to MPs. And in fact the April 12 date has been No.10’s own real private deadline for days now anyway, as it is more aware than anyone that’s the last time legislation can be passed to allow UK participation in the Euro elections. Yet if her deal is rejected by the Commons a third time, April may indeed prove to be the cruellest month for the PM. MPs may also need to update the old saying: fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me; fool me thrice, shame on us all.
One area where the prime minister did try to change tack last night was on her televised ‘Enemies of the People’ rant from just 24 hours earlier. “Last night I expressed my frustrations and I know that MPs are frustrated too – they have difficult jobs to do,” she said. It wasn’t an apology (this is Theresa May we’re talking about), but it was an admission that she had lashed out in a way that was completely counter-productive. Aside from her rhetoric undermining the personal safety of MPs at a febrile time, it was just dreadfully bad politics to alienate the very people she needs to snatch victory from the jaws of Brexit defeat.
The bad blood around was obvious on Wednesday and yesterday in the Commons. As Rob Halfon told our podcast, the mood in the Commons tea room was worse than at any time in May’s premiership. “The way people were talking, and it doesn’t matter which wing of the party, and it’s either loyalists, Remainers, Leavers, whatever, I think she is going to go soon,” he said. Hardline Eurosceptics are immune to threats, and even an offer to link her deal to her resignation may not be enough now.
The inner core of Brexiteers don’t believe a word she says these days, or at least not until it is confirmed by deed or actual legislation. The fury at the spectacle of Brussels telling the UK when it can and can’t leave is likely to make some in the European Research Group dig in further. Paul Brand at ITV (another media outlet that has had a good war) reveals another major rift, between No.10 and the Chief Whip. Julian Smith complained to MPs that he found May’s No.10 TV outburst “appalling”. “She just won’t listen to us,” he said. Yes, that’s the man in charge of Tory party discipline. Ex-minister Tracey Crouch has told whips the PM “had to go”, the Sun’s Steve Hawkes reports, adding one official called May’s telly blunder a ‘Ratner moment’.
In a further ominous development, the Telegraph reports that Tory backbench 1922 committee chairman Sir Graham Brady went to see May on Monday and warned her that a growing number of her MPs think she has to go. His trip to Downing Street came after he was “bombarded with text messages” over the weekend. Just hours before the second meaningful vote, May was confronted by 15 whips, one of whom dared to suggest she should step aside. Add in her own Cabinet minister (Amber Rudd) trolling her on Twitter with end-of-the-pier-show gags, and you can see it’s going to take something special for May to turn things round.
Of course, if May does quit she risks ignominy even greater than that heaped on David Cameron after he decided to leave the scene in 2016. The whole point of her being in No.10 was precisely to do the dirty, messy job of cleaning up after him. Thanks to that April deadline, the next fortnight will be crucial. Some MPs think that Parliament finally has a chance to live up to the moment and effectively become the Prime Minister we’ve been missing for years.
There is one last chance for May to get her deal over the line with a decent majority. She could say this weekend she accepts the amendment from Lisa Nandy and Gareth Snell that would give Parliament a direct vote over any future UK-EU trade deal. This is a procedural move that some Eurosceptics may welcome too, as it hands to Westminster the power to literally set the terms of trade. If they want a Canada-plus model, they can drive it. If they want a Norway-plus one, that’s possible too. I’m told government insiders think accepting the Nandy plan could bring as many as 50 Labour MPs over. Given that Labour’s frontbench is also focused on the ‘political declaration’ rather than the ‘withdrawal agreement’, it’s not impossible they could back it too. Don’t forget, Labour has a difficult dilemma too: be seen to vote for a long delay to Brexit (and to Euro elections) or enable a no-deal exit.
Next week, the other alternative plan that is going to dominate events is the Letwin-Grieve-Benn amendment that seeks to finally seize control of the Commons timetable. The last Benn move failed by just two votes and many in government fear it will get over the line this time, either thanks to a new ministerial resignation or some other shift. If May’s plan is included in the series of indicative votes, it could emerge as the ‘last man standing’, rather than the Norway or second referendum options. The big, big question for both Tories and Labour is whether they offer free votes or whip them. That decision will I suspect finally decided what kind of Brexit we all end up with.
On Monday (thanks to another sleeper procedural move set in train by Dominic Grieve), the government will stage its ‘Next Steps’ debate in the Commons. Watch for whether Labour or others table an amendment that specify changes to the political declaration that would be needed for it support the ‘withdrawal agreement’. That’s precisely why May will need the DUP (which really is worried about a no-deal threat to Northern Irish farmers) to break the habit of a lifetime and declare this weekend that it is now backing her deal. She desperately needs some momentum before Parliament takes the decision out of her hands. And before her party does.
Watch Andrea Leadsom tell MPs that a million clicks on an e-petition ain’t nothing compared to 17 million votes in a referendum.
Things are getting serious on the no-deal front. SkyNews had a superb exclusive that the armed forces have activated a team in a nuclear-proof bunker under the Ministry of Defence as the government prepares next Monday to enter “very high readiness mode” leaving the EU without a deal. And the BBC’s Mark Darcy reports that Privy Councillors have been summoned to the Cabinet Office for a meeting today at 2pm for a briefing on Operation Yellowhammer, the no-deal emergency programme.
I’ve been saying for some time that governments often lose power when the public scent a real whiff of decay of an administration that just seems incompetent. And chaotic rail services are one running sore that is every week leading many middle-of-the-road and swing voters to think the Tories can’t run a bath. This morning, Waterloo station (one of the country’s busiest) has cancelled all trains in and out because of overrunning engineering work.
If you’re reading this on the web, sign-up HERE to get the WaughZone delivered to your inbox.
Got something you want to share? Please send any stories/tips/quotes/pix/plugs/gossip to Paul Waugh(paul.waugh@huffingtonpost.com), Ned Simons (ned.simons@huffingtonpost.com), Rachel Wearmouth (rachel.wearmouth@huffpost.com) and Jasmin Gray (jasmin.gray@huffpost.com) and Arj Singh (arj.singh@huffpost.com)