Angela Eagle Interview With BBC Radio 4's John Humphrys Sparks Outrage At 'Sexist Questioning'

Pundits point to male politicians who cried and weren't called out for it.
Eagle had been discussing her vision for how to ensure women were paid the same as men when she was asked about crying
Eagle had been discussing her vision for how to ensure women were paid the same as men when she was asked about crying
Matt Crossick/Matt Crossick

Veteran BBC presenter John Humphrys has prompted outrage for quizzing Angela Eagle on whether she was too emotional to be a political leader.

The Today programme host interrupted Eagle, who was discussing women workers’ rights, to question her emotional stability in an interview on Tuesday.

Humphrys challenged her over whether voters wanted a prime minister who “weeps in the face of this sort of thing” when “confronting Putin”.

Humphrys asked whether Eagle thought she should be able to control her emotions
Humphrys asked whether Eagle thought she should be able to control her emotions
Jeff Overs via Getty Images

Eagle rebutted that there was “more than one way to be a leader”, saying she had cried in reaction to being unable to deliver on her promise to make Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership work, when interviewed on the BBC’s World at One in June.

“Being in touch with your emotions is quite an important thing,” Eagle said. “Politicians ought to be human beings and leaders can be human beings.”

She added: “I’m not crying now, am I.”

But the line of questioning from Humphrys prompted allegations of “sexism”, with popular commentators on women’s issues criticising the Today presenter for his interview conduct.

Woke up to hear John Humphrys quizzing a female politician about whether she's too emotional for the job. Christ #r4today

— Fiona Sturges (@FionaSturges) July 12, 2016

Women’s Equality Party leader Sophie Walker lamented that the move came just days after the row over Andrea Leadsom’s comments on motherhood caused uproar in the Conservative leadership contest.

Day after we stop assessing female leaders by childbearing capacity, John Humphrys finds @angelaeagle wanting for being emotional. #r4today

— SophieWalker (@SophieRunning) July 12, 2016

And Shashank Joshi tackled Humphrys over his assertion people would question whether Eagle could stand up to Putin.

The academic pointed to footage of Putin crying from 2012 when he was re-elected as the country’s leader.

Feminist campaigner Caroline Criado-Perez, who led the campaign to keep a woman featured on British banknotes, also fired at Humphrys that there was “nothing wrong with expressing emotion”.

Prominent feminist campaigners rounded on Humphrys
Prominent feminist campaigners rounded on Humphrys

Others also pointed out notable politicians who had cried on TV before.

Author Emma Kennedy reminded radio listeners that US president Barack Obama has cried on live television a number of times before. The Democrat leader has been moved most notably by issues around gun crime.

Hey @BBCr4today, will John Humphreys tackle Obama on his occasional crying during office?

— Emma Kennedy (@EmmaKennedy) July 12, 2016

While journalist Sunny Hundal branded the line of questioning “sexist” and said it “wouldn’t be asked of men”. He also pointed to former US congress Speaker John Boehner, who has cried on TV before after listening to an address from Pope Francis.

Urgh. Really sexist Q on R4 on whether Eagle can confront Putin b/c she shed a tear once. Wouldn't be asked of men. John Boehner cried ATM

— Sunny Hundal (@sunny_hundal) July 12, 2016

The Mirror’s Jason Beatie said the BBC interview had a “whiff of misogyny” and said that Chancellor George Osborne cried at former PM Margaret Thatcher’s funeral.

“Is he also too emotional?” Beatie asked.

Was there a whiff of misogyny to John Humphrys' questioning of Angela Eagle? Osborne cried at Thatcher's funeral. Is he also too emotional?

— Jason Beattie (@JBeattieMirror) July 12, 2016

A BBC spokeswoman told HuffPost UK: “Our audience expects Today presenters to robustly question any potential future political party leaders about their suitability as John did on this occasion.”

READ MORE:

Close

What's Hot