Daniel Kawczynski Refuses To Retract False Second World War Claim – Then Drops Another Clanger

“I was promised you wouldn’t raise that, but...”
LOADINGERROR LOADING

A Tory MP who recently drew criticism for a historically inaccurate tweet has now claimed Britain “liberate[d] half of Europe” during the second world war “by herself”.

During an interview with Sky News on Tuesday, Daniel Kawczynski was asked if he wanted to retract a claim made earlier this month in which he said there was “no Marshall Plan for us, only for Germany”.

The Marshall Plan was an American financial initiative to rebuild western Europe after the devastation of war, and Britain was the biggest beneficiary, receiving what in modern terms amounted to around $100bn.

Britain helped to liberate half of Europe. She mortgaged herself up to eye balls in process. No Marshall Plan for us only for Germany. We gave up war reparations in 1990. We put £370 billion into EU since we joined. Watch the way ungrateful EU treats us now. We will remember.

— Daniel Kawczynski (@DKShrewsbury) February 2, 2019

During the interview on Tuesday, host Adam Boulton brought up the tweet but Kawczynski refused to admit he was wrong, before making yet another dubious claim:

ADAM BOULTON: “That’s wrong, isn’t it? Britain was actually the biggest recipient of Marshall Plan funds from the USA.”

DANIEL KAWCZYNSKI: “I was promised you wouldn’t raise that but...”

BOULTON: “Sorry but I wasn’t told that, I just want to clear the air.

KAWCZYNSKI: “I’ve got into a lot of trouble for that Marshall Plan tweet, but what I would say is that it’s very difficult for MPs to get everything across in the limited number of characters.

“What I was trying to say is that the United Kingdom, I believe the United Kingdom, did not benefit as much as other countries because of the huge loans that we had to take out during the Second World War which we only finished paying off in 2007.

“But if I have caused any offence with that tweet then I apologise.”

BOULTON: “So you admit it was factually wrong [to say there was] no Marshall Plan for us?”

KAWCZYNSKI: “Well Britain did receive money under the Marshall Plan but the huge loans that she took and the massive task that she took on by herself to liberate half of Europe, cost her dearly and she’s been paying [back] those loans up until ten years ago.”

"It’s very difficult for MPs to get everything across in the limited number of characters."@adamboultonSKY asks Conservative MP @DKShrewsbury about his incorrect tweet claiming that Britain didn't get any money from the US after the Second World War. pic.twitter.com/UsYX3HzN7Z

— Sky News Politics (@SkyNewsPolitics) February 12, 2019

Far from doing it alone, Britain liberated Europe alongside a multi-national coalition that included the USA, Canada, Poland, Greece, France, Belgium and six other nations.

The interview drew yet more criticism on social media. Guardian columnist Maria Hyde said he “is still incapable of admitting he got basic facts staggeringly wrong”.

I see @DKShrewsbury is still incapable of admitting he got basic facts staggeringly wrong. What he will say is "I was promised you wouldn't raise that". https://t.co/LbRhyRh67n

— Marina Hyde (@MarinaHyde) February 12, 2019

Oliver Kamm of The Times said he “actually seeks veto on the questions he’s asked”.

“I was promised you wouldn’t raise that...” My goodness. @DKShrewsbury actually seeks a veto on the questions he’ll be asked. https://t.co/02wbf3SHGW

— Oliver Kamm (@OliverKamm) February 12, 2019

Fascinated to know what format @DKShrewsbury considers the minimum to be able to tell the truth. 280 characters not enough, and nor it seems, is the sit down TV interview.

Would he consider retracting his Marshall Plan rubbish in, say, an audience with the Pope? https://t.co/zF6xeWTOz1

— Tom Peck (@tompeck) February 12, 2019

Kawczynski is becoming a regular in the headlines – just last month he revealed he has asked the Polish government to intervene if Britain asks the EU for an extension of Article 50.

He made the announcement in a tweet, claiming he was trying to thwart “attempts by Remainer MPs to delay or obstruct Brexit”.

The move was swiftly condemned as commentators highlighted the hypocrisy of someone campaigning for more sovereignty actively seeking another government to interfere in the UK’s affairs.

Close

What's Hot