Former US president Donald Trump suggested on Monday that America threatens Russian president Vladimir Putin with American nuclear submarine patrols, which would likely dramatically escalate global tensions amid Russia’s ongoing assault on Ukraine.
“You should say: ‘Look, you mention that word one more time and we’re gonna send [submarines] over and we’ll be coasting back and forth, up and down your coast,’” Trump said in an appearance on Fox Business, continuing a tour of media appearances to downplay his questionable record on Russia and Ukraine.
Earlier in the interview, the former president bizarrely described nuclear weaponry as “the n-word… the nuclear word”.
Trump’s suggestion would be dangerous. If Washington sent nuclear submarines into Russian waters, Putin would likely see that as an intolerable provocation. He would almost certainly react with a greater threat or even an attack on US assets, sparking a domino effect that could lead to war between two of the world’s strongest militaries.
Because of his preference for military showboating and his deep-rooted desire to project strength, Putin is extremely unlikely to see a move like the one Trump suggested as a reason to behave less aggressively.
President Joe Biden has repeatedly said that while the US must support Ukraine’s defense, his top priority is preventing “World War III”. The Biden administration has sent Ukraine $2 billion in military aid, including missiles to target Russian tanks and aircraft, ammunition and defensive gear.
But Biden has rejected calls — including from Ukrainian president Vlodoymyr Zelenskyy — to directly insert US forces into the war by attempting to enforce a no-fly zone, saying the risk of a ruinous confrontation is too great.
![Two anti-nuclear activists dressed as then-President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin ride models of nuclear bombs in front of Berlin's Brandenburg Gate on July 30, 2020.](https://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/6238d338210000694850435c.jpeg?ops=scalefit_720_noupscale)
When he was president, Trump blocked nearly $400 million in military assistance to Ukraine while he attempted to extract a political favor from Zelenskyy. He also repeatedly criticized Ukraine while justifying Russian attempts to undermine it, including Putin’s takeover of the Crimea peninsula.
The Republican leader is now arguing that if he were still in office, Putin would not have launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine. But Trump actually praised Putin’s strategy before the invasion began. Since then, he has offered a mishmash of attacks on Biden’s response to the crisis while claiming that he, too, wants “to end this tragedy without getting Americans snared into a gruesome and very bloody war”.
The idea of publicly threatening Russian sovereignty with American nuclear weapons would likely have the opposite effect.
That incoherence reflects a persistent problem with Trump’s approach to foreign policy: He wants to be seen as an anti-war while investing in and casually deploying military power.
Trump increased spending on the US nuclear arsenal by 28%. (Biden has so far declined to change course.) And by the end of his presidency, Trump appeared so cavalier about using nuclear weapons that the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Mark Milley, summoned senior military officers to remind them that any nuclear launch required input from a range of officials, according to a book published last year by Washington Post reporters Robert Costa and Bob Woodward.
Earlier this month, Trump recommended that the US bomb Russia with planes falsely labeled as Chinese, according to the Post.
In his Monday interview, the ex-president praised his own investment in nuclear submarines.
“I hated to do it, but I rebuilt our nuclear capability like nobody has ever thought even possible,” Trump said.
The pro-Democratic group American Bridge flagged Trump’s latest remarks for HuffPost.