The 2017 'Youthquake' Election Is A Myth, New Research Uncovers

Claims of a surge in voting among the under-25s 'largely based on anecdotes,' says study.
LOADINGERROR LOADING

The so-called ‘youthquake’ of the 2017 General Election was a myth, and not behind Jeremy Corbyn’s better than expected performance, a team of experts has found.

Despite pledges to slash tuition fees, chants of “Oh, Jeremy Corbyn” at Glastonbury and the Labour leader being mobbed with demands for selfies, turnout among the under-25s was broadly similar to 2015 and may even have decreased, the academics said.

According to the British Election Study (BES) the biggest boost in turnout was among the 30 to 45s - the same age group that saw the biggest switch in allegiance from Tory to Labour.

Voters under the age of 25 were more likely to vote Labour than ever before, but there was no evidence they flocked to the polls in greater numbers.

“The Labour ‘youthquake’ explanation looks to become an assumed fact about the 2017 election,” the report said.

The Oxford English Dictionary even declared ‘youthquake’ their word of the year. But people have been much too hasty. There was no surge in youth turnout at the 2017 election.”

While Labour’s election surge could not be attributed to a spike in under-25s turnout, the study found the party picked up new support in almost every age group.

Youthquake was a convenient narrative but completely ignores the real reason Labour won back seats, 30-45-year-old straight switchers from Tory to Labour. That's the interesting demographic, not 18-25s.

— Jessica Elgot (@jessicaelgot) January 29, 2018

Youthquake '17: Surge in younger voters under 40 to Labour - especially amongst 18-24s - delivered strong performance for Jeremy Corbyn. BES figures show it might have been partly driven by increased turnout amongst 25-35 year olds. Older voters - over 55s - moved to Tories. pic.twitter.com/Dl7LDAWaiE

— Alan Travis (@alantravis40) January 29, 2018

BES analysis commissioned by the BBC said: “There was a slight increase in turnout in the sorts of places with lots of young adults. But it was not necessarily those young adults doing the extra turning out.”

The Conservatives, meanwhile, only picked up new votes with those over 60 - though this age bracket is more likely to turn up on polling day than any other.

Overall turnout went up in 2017 by just 2.5%, with MPs and journalists divided as to what the dynamic might spell for future elections.

No “youthquake” says research but, more importantly, young voters influenced by and rebelled against #Brexit vote - not tuition fees. Worrying for #Labour if the next election is after a successful and clean Brexit. https://t.co/mv1cp5oFBp

— Michael Fabricant (@Mike_Fabricant) January 29, 2018

Okay so I understand why people are saying "there was no youthquake!" but that increase in turnout among 25-40 year olds is _really_ significant. Not "youths" maybe, but young adults. That _would_ be the story if just saw this graph in isolation, and rightly so. pic.twitter.com/AjEijIo7hg

— David Ottewell (@davidottewell) January 29, 2018

The fact that Corbyn's vote wasn't boosted by hoards of "naive" youngsters should be very worrying for the Conservatives, who only gained among people aged 60+.

Labour gained supporters at all other ages.#Youthquake pic.twitter.com/bm3oh7es87

— Patrick Scott (@Patrick_E_Scott) January 29, 2018

The BES study of electoral behaviour used face-to-face surveys to gather information about voters as well as those who did not vote.

Analysis of the 2015 election and the snap poll in 2017 found older people were much more likely to have voted than young people and the age-turnout relationship had barely changed.

The margin of error in the analysis means a small increase or decrease in youth turnout in 2017 cannot be ruled out.

Labour’s leader, regularly greeted with chants of “Oh Jeremy Corbyn” and often pictured surrounded by young people during the election, was often credited with mobilising previously disengaged voters under 25. But the study suggested the claims were “largely based on anecdotes”.

The BES also found it was likely that there had been a small increase in turnout across a large age range.

“We can be confident, though, that there was no dramatic surge in youth turnout of the sort suggested by some other surveys. In short, there was no ‘youthquake’,” it added.

Close

What's Hot