Meghan Markle Prince Harry Statement On Media Prompts Row Over Mail On Sunday Column

Unprecedented Palace statement creates lots of discussion online.
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are now confirmed to be in a relationship
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are now confirmed to be in a relationship
PA/PA Wire

Prince Harry’s extraordinary attack on the media over its treatment of girlfriend Meghan Markle has sparked heated debate - including a row over the use of the word “exotic” in a Mail On Sunday opinion column.

The prince’s unprecedented statement, issued through Kensington Palace, stopped short of naming individual publications but said Suits actress Markle had been subjected to “the racial undertones of comment pieces”.

As reaction to the statement brewed on social media, ITV presenter Charlene White described a Mail On Sunday piece by Rachel Johnson, sister of Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson, as having ‘racist undertones’ and being ‘disgraceful’.

Some of the racist undertones used by so-called "respected" paper columnists have been disgraceful re: Harry and Meghan. Grow up.

— Charlene White (@CharleneWhite) November 8, 2016

She highlighted one paragraph of Johnson’s column and questioned the use of the word “exotic”.

I may or may not be eye-balling Rachel Johnson for this little gem. "Thicken their blood with some rich and exotic DNA". EXOTIC. Kmt. pic.twitter.com/SEmCW9cVXF

— Charlene White (@CharleneWhite) November 8, 2016

Black people been here since before the 16th Century. And Rachel Johnson is describing Prince Harry gf's mixed-heritage as "exotic". Whatevs

— Charlene White (@CharleneWhite) November 8, 2016

Yet responding to the criticism, Rachel Johnson told The Huffington Post UK: “Any reader who read that as a ‘racist’ comment can’t read. Is ‘exotic’ a racist banned word?”

In her column, Johnson said that Markle would not pass the “Mum Test” in part due to her habit of ‘bolting’ from relationships.

She also described the actress’s mother as “a dreadlocked African-American lady from the wrong side of the tracks”. The extract was widely criticised on Twitter.

This is not about a free press. It's about basic ethics. How is it acceptable to call a mixed race person's DNA "exotic"?

— Henry Mance (@henrymance) November 8, 2016

@CharleneWhite That's one hell of a paragraph, so blisteringly obvious in its unconcealed bile. My GOD

— Piccola stella (@Sixcheeks30) November 8, 2016

@CharleneWhite this is so explicit with it wow

— Bolu Babalola (@BeeBabs) November 8, 2016

@CharleneWhite That article was just awful in every way.

— Elle D (@4elleboogie) November 8, 2016

Labour MP for Brent Dawn Butler also tweeted her disagreement with the column.

@CharleneWhite double KMT

— (((Dawn Butler MP))) (@DawnButlerBrent) November 8, 2016

But Johnson told HuffPost: “My column specifically welcomed and celebrated the fact that Meghan Markle is proudly mixed race. I think it’s fantastic.

“Yes I am guilty of suggesting that when it comes to flirting and teasing and ‘bolting’ Harry may have met his match.

“I have seen Prince Harry’s pained statement. And I to an extent feel his pain and hear him. He is a young man in love.”

Johnson later responded to criticism on Twitter and explained her use of the word “exotic”.

@henrymance My col was the opposite of racist and "exotic" means foreign, non-native, or originating in a foreign country. So shoot me now!

— Rachel Johnson (@RachelSJohnson) November 8, 2016
Rachel Johnson, sister of Boris, wrote the column headlined: "Sorry, Harry but your bolter doesn't pass my Mum Test'
Rachel Johnson, sister of Boris, wrote the column headlined: "Sorry, Harry but your bolter doesn't pass my Mum Test'
Isabel Infantes/EMPICS Entertainment

She continued: “He has every right to express his feelings and views. But this is a free country with a free press and I have every right to express mine.

“I am astonished that anyone could take offence at my column in which I loudly welcomed someone of mixed race parentage joining the Royal Family.”

The move by Kensington Palace to confront media coverage so directly prompted reaction from Fatima Manji, the Channel 4 journalist lambasted for wearing a hijab during a bulletin on the Nice terror attacks.

This is quite astonishing. Kensington palace calls out 'racial undertones' , 'racism +sexism' of press in coverage of Harry + Meghan Markle https://t.co/C6w2GEGbKd

— Fatima Manji (@fatimamanji) November 8, 2016

Whatever your views on Royal family's "right to privacy" + whatever your interest or lack of in Harry's love life. This is quite something

— Fatima Manji (@fatimamanji) November 8, 2016

And Manji pointed out Harry’s own controversies in the past.

Of course it's worth mentioning Prince Harry *himself* has been involved in controversies involving racism before.

— Fatima Manji (@fatimamanji) November 8, 2016

One tweet seemed to sum the entire situation up for many people.

Prince Harry having to confirm his relationship with Meghan Markle with a "Could you not be racist about this please?" press release. 2016. https://t.co/txIOImHbuL

— Carl Anka (@Ankaman616) November 8, 2016

Since the relationship between the Prince, 32, and the US actress, 35, was revealed just over a week ago, Markle has been the object of intense speculation in the press.

The statement highlighted Prince Harry’s disappointment at not protecting Markle from the scrutiny.

It read: “Prince Harry is worried about Ms Markle’s safety and is deeply disappointed that he not been able to protect her.”

Meghan Markle stars in US TV series 'Suits'
Meghan Markle stars in US TV series 'Suits'
Dennis Van Tine/ABACA USA

It continued: “It is not right that a few months into a relationship with him that Ms Markle should be subjected to such a storm… This is not a game - it is her life and his.”

No single publication or writer has been singled out for criticism by the Palace.

Press watchdog IPSO told The Huffington Post UK it had received no complaints about Rachel Johnson’s column in the Mail On Sunday.

Prince Harry used an unprecedented statement to attack the media's treatment of girlfriend Meghan Markle
Prince Harry used an unprecedented statement to attack the media's treatment of girlfriend Meghan Markle
John Stillwell/PA Wire

ISPO did however issue an advisory note to publications, which read: “Ms Markle says that she and her mother have been the subject of harassment by journalists abroad.

“She says she is concerned that the publication of articles concerning her private life, by the media in the UK, is creating a market for material obtained in circumstances of harassment abroad.

“She is further concerned about the publication of speculation about her private life, which she describes as intrusive.”

Before You Go

LOADINGERROR LOADING
Close

What's Hot