Russell Brand's Parenting Views Labelled 'Sexist' After Nappies Comment

"When I looked after Mabel on her own, she dropped two social classes in an hour."
LOADINGERROR LOADING

Russell Brand has been criticised for his “sexist” views on parenting after admitting he has never looked after his kids for a full day on his own – and doesn’t change their nappies either.

The 43-year-old, who is dad to two-year-old Mabel and six-month-old Peggy with his wife Laura Gallacher, said he’s “not so good” on nappies and making sure his kids eat food.

In an interview with The Times, when asked if he had spent 24 hours looking after his children, he replied: “No. She wouldn’t go away for 24 hours, Laura. She respects and cares for their safety too much.

“When I looked after Mabel on her own, she dropped two social classes in an hour. In no time at all we’re in a coffee shop, she’s just got a nappy on, she’s covered in stuff because I’m not willing to fight any of the battles.”

Star Max/IPx

Brand went on to praise his wife’s parenting, adding: “Laura’s able to sustain and maintain domesticity in a way that’s astonishing. Me, I am dedicated to it, devoted to it, but I am still surprised when it’s like, ‘Oh my God, this is f****** really hard and it’s so exhausting.’”

He said Laura does most of the practical parenting – like remembering to pack the nappy bags and give the kids snacks. But, he added, he did drive his toddler to and from play school recently.

Brand’s comments didn’t go down so well on Twitter, after journalist Hadley Freeman tweeted two screenshots of the interview, attracting more than 10,000 likes and thousands of comments.

Russell Brand pitching himself as some New Age, all new, mature and sensitive dad - and then saying he’s too sensitive to do any actual parenting is the most Russell Brand thing I’ve ever read in my life pic.twitter.com/T0KSObnWXo

— Hadley Freeman (@HadleyFreeman) January 20, 2019

Many took to Twitter to air their own views, too, branding his attitude as “cobblers”, “brocialism” and “a load of woo woo”.

Eeeurgh. What a load of cobblers. Imagine if mothers (and Russell Brand’s partner) refused to change nappies, remember snacks for their toddlers & do BASIC PARENTING because of being ‘romantic & reflective’. Turns out Russell Brand is just a big old fashioned sexist. https://t.co/FEdHpfZIEi

— Rhiannon Clapperton (@HughesyRhi) January 20, 2019

Russell Brand embodies brocialism. Wants credit for being all woke and sensitive while still expecting the women in his life to do the actual work.

— what will grow crooked you can't make straight (@portraitinflesh) January 20, 2019

So Russell Brand is capable of coping with a high flying career but apparently too mystical and sensitive to look after his own kids. Or to tell it how it is, he’s a stupid sexist hippy. If you want to start a revolution, @rustyrockets, stop exploiting those closest to you. https://t.co/RapSeJj5sO

— Fortitude J. B. Huddlebeck يعقوب 🕊 ✍🏾 (@Julaybib) January 21, 2019

Russell Brand’s approach to parenting reminds me of that time Rupert Murdoch tweeted that he was babysitting his own child https://t.co/Ao28N7DsyK

— anyabike (@anyabike) January 20, 2019

Basically Laura has 3 children pic.twitter.com/GJsMbTtXgy

— Sarah (@sbl1976) January 20, 2019

As ever Russell Brand reels off a load of woo woo to distract from the fact that he's got a shitty attitude towards women. https://t.co/7mxHCUQbVj

— Ellie Mae O'Hagan 🏴 (@MissEllieMae) January 20, 2019
Close