Why Stephen Phillips’ Resignation Proves Hard-Brexiters Don’t Speak For The 17.4 Million Leavers

Why Stephen Phillips’ Resignation Proves Hard-Brexiters Don’t Speak For The 17.4 Million
Matt Cardy via Getty Images

The resignation of a Tory MP who backed Brexit has triggered debate over what 17.4 million ‘Leave’ voters actually voted for.

Stephen Phillips announced on Friday he was stepping down from Parliament over “significant policy differences” with his party.

But the move exposed just how divided many Brexiters are over what Britain’s future relationship with Europe should be.

Writing for the Guardian in October he said:

“I also thought that if there were a vote to leave the EU, the outward-looking, internationalist face of modern multicultural Britain would win through: that although we would leave the EU, we would remain in the single market to which the manifesto of every major political party at the last election committed us – a market on which our prosperity as a nation, and our ability to raise the taxes to pay for public services, is founded.”

But Phillips was today accused by some of not being a true Leaver - because he wanted the UK to remain in the single market.

@faisalislam @333doc1 @rolandmcs You can't be a Leaver and stay in the Single Market. The European Union IS the Single Market.

— Peter (@PJA1066) November 4, 2016

@rolandmcs @faisalislam He wants to stay in the single market, so not a leaver is he. That was the deal unless negotiated

— Pete Dockerty (@333doc1) November 4, 2016

Sky News’ Faisal Islam pointed out that if critics of Phillips’ were going to discount him as a true Brexiter, they could not claim to include him in their mandate of 17.4 million people - nor other people like him.

The presenter said that instead it was “unknown millions” who backed a ‘Hard Brexit’ and that all ‘Leave’ voters could not be used as a bloc mandate.

Phillips voted Leave, but "not a leaver" as doesnt want to leave SM? Logically can't then claim 17.4 million as mandate. Unknown millions. https://t.co/0s9dG2pTfi

— Faisal Islam (@faisalislam) November 4, 2016

Islam pointed out that there were likely other people who voted ‘Leave’ for the same reason as Phillips.

Both Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson and Tory MEP Daniel Hannan said Britain would and should, respectively, stay in the single market.

@FangornForest1 those who say Stephen Phillips is not a Leaver cannot then count him as part of their mandate. How many people like him -IDK

— Faisal Islam (@faisalislam) November 4, 2016

Millionaire Ukip donor Arron Banks responded to Islam by claiming the single market “is the EU”. He wrote:

The SM is the EU . We voted to leave. The PM & leading remainders all made the point over and over again https://t.co/uLX7UyPcpn

— Arron Banks (@Arron_banks) November 4, 2016

But Islam challenged him, asking how, if Phillips was not considered a ‘Leaver’, Banks could claim his vote bolstered the mandate for a Hard Brexit.

@Arron_banks if Stephen Phillips is not a Leaver, by your definition, how can you claim his vote as part of your mandate?

— Faisal Islam (@faisalislam) November 4, 2016

Banks simply replied:

@faisalislam who gives a fig what he believes read the government leaflet - remain or leave we will implement your decision

— Arron Banks (@Arron_banks) November 4, 2016

Phillips himself wrote just weeks before his resignation that while “the government may have a mandate for Brexit, it has no mandate at all for what it should look like”.

He wrote in the Guardian: “Hard Brexit, with all the damage it will do, has seemingly become the received wisdom, without any mandate at all from the British people, and seemingly without any challenge – at least until this week.”

NOW READ:

Close

What's Hot