Stop The War Coalition Deputy Chris Nineham On Today Programme Calls For 'Opposing The West'

'Not bothering to even attempt to live up to their name.'
LOADINGERROR LOADING

The deputy chair of the Stop the War coalition has suggested the most important factor in stopping the conflict in Syria is to “oppose the West”.

In a “car crash” interview on Radio 4’s Today programme, Chris Nineham was questioned about Boris Johnson’s call for people to protest Russia’s involvement in the war by demonstrating outside the country’s embassy in London.

The Foreign Secretary’s comments came after Labour’s Ann Clwyd urged those who care about the plight of Syrian civilians to gather outside Russian embassies across the globe until the country stops its bombing campaign.

The interview with the Stop the War chap was a car crash. No one could have got much out of that. #r4today

— Johnfromsoho (@johnfromsoho) October 12, 2016

Last few words from Stop The War Coalition spokesman "oppose the West!". Summed up perfectly stance on @BBCr4today.

— Ross Grant (@RossIGrant) October 12, 2016

He also called for a war crimes investigation into the bombing of an aid convoy last month in which at least 21 people died.

Today host, Sarah Montague, began the segment on Wednesday morning by asking what the Stop the War coalition was doing to oppose the conflict.

That Stop the War iview is golden. He spends whole thing trying to present balanced view & then at the end blurts out OPPOSING THE WEST.

— Ian Dunt (@IanDunt) October 12, 2016

Nineham said: “We are we’re protesting with statements and our information that we’ve put out. We’ve condemned not just Russia but all foreign interventions into what is now an absolutely disastrous and horrible situation for the Syrian people.

“But we were set up as a coalition as a response to 9/11 and in response to the Western, British-supported drive to war back in 2001 and that is our focus.

“There’s a good reason for that...”

Montague interrupted, pointing out “we are in 2016 now” with a conflict raging in which “Aleppo is being destroyed”.

She added: “You have a Labour MP, Ann Clwyd, saying ‘where’s the rage, we should have two million, three million, four million people outside the Russian embassy...’

“Should people demonstrate outside the Russian embassy?”

Nineham replied: “This is not a serious argument being put [forward] by Boris Johnson, he’s characteristically trivialising the situation. If they want to protest outside the Russian embassy, they know where it is.”

The Stop Some Wars Coalition https://t.co/jxPR8Nyp8V

— Jonathan Downing (@jonadowning) October 12, 2016

Speaking in the Commons on Tuesday afternoon, Johnson questioned the lack of “commensurate horror” amongst anti-war protest groups and agreed with Clwyd’s desire to see demonstrations outside the Russian embassy.

When asked if Stop the War would get involved in such demonstrations, Nineham replied: “No we wouldn’t and the reason for that is that our focus is on what our government is doing.

“As I was saying, there’s a very good reason for this because we can make a difference to what Britain does, we can make a difference to what our allies do to a certain extent and we have done.

“But if we have a protest outside the Russian embassy it wouldn’t make a blind bit of difference to what Putin does because we are in the West and we are in Britain.

Isn't Stop The War's whole supposed thesis that we can persuade other countries to do stuff? Or is that only when it suits them? https://t.co/LQGGJK7L8u

— James Ball (@jamesrbuk) October 12, 2016

“And not only that but a protest outside the Russian embassy would actually contribute to increasing the hysteria and the jingoism that is being whipped up at the minute to go against Russia... being organised by politicians and by the media against Russia to see Russia as the only problem in Syria.”

Russian forces aligned with Syrian leader, Bashir al-Assad, claim they are targeting terrorists, particularly in the city of Aleppo.

Opponents on the ground in Syria and in the international community however, claim the use of force is being used to wipe out government opposition and cement Assad’s position while also killing hundreds of innocent civilians.

Where is the Stop The War office and can we protest outside it?

— Miss Politics (@Pooolitics) October 12, 2016

That's "Stop the War" who protest against US intervention, even though they can't influence American policy. 🤔 Hypocrisy abounds. https://t.co/RwzNpw8u6J

— Dave Jones (@WelshGasDoc) October 12, 2016

Montague said: “So you would urge people not to demonstrate against Russia?”

Nineham replied: “We’re not worried about it but what we’re saying is that there’s a hysteria that’s being organised by politicians and by the media against Russia to see Russia as the only problem in Syria.

“Syria is a multi-faceted war that involves Saudi Arabia, it involves the US and Britain who have been bombing the country as well.

“The real problem here is you have people who regard themselves as responsible politicians like Andrew Mitchell and John Woodcock and Boris Johnson to a lesser extent who are seriously saying that what Syria needs is more Western bombs, more Western munitions.

“And Andrew Mitchell actually came on this programme yesterday and seriously said it wouldn’t be a problem if RAF fighter pilots attacked Russian planes.”

Stop the War are refusing to protest against Russia? Here's your credibility guys, there's an open window. Chuck it out.

— Emma Kennedy (@EmmaKennedy) October 12, 2016

Mitchell has called for a no-fly zone enforced by Nato jets over the skies of Syria.

Nineham argued this simply risked escalating the conflict.

He said: “The possibility now presents itself of there being a confrontation for the first time since the Second World War, between Russia and Western powers including Britain.

“And anyone who has a responsibility for peace or the future of the planet quite frankly needs to mobilise against that...”

At this point Montague cut off the interview but Nineham managed to get in a last few words.

“... and that means opposing the West.”

The interview prompted heavy criticism on social media with some accusing Stop the War of hypocrisy for protesting in the past against certain regimes but not against Russia.

Nope, they're TOTALLY UNABLE to demonstrate outside an embassy. Wouldn't be appropriate. https://t.co/PhEXDgU96V

— Primly Stable (@PrimlyStable) October 12, 2016

What’s wrong with mocking “Stop the War” for not bothering to even attempt to live up to their name?

— Pres Trump & Brexit (@dnotice2012) October 12, 2016

This is the same Stop the War that marched about Israel's action over Gaza, then? https://t.co/NOjTxyhAwj

— John O'Shea (@politicalhackuk) October 12, 2016

Others however supported their stance.

People just don't seem to grasp that
Stop The War will not be used as tool by war mongering gov to push their propaganda and lies

— Mai Waby (@maiwaby) October 12, 2016

'Stop The War' does what it says on the tin. Any cheerleaders for World War Three can form a Start the War Coalition. #TheMainEnemyIsAtHome https://t.co/UtgQPVuhgd

— Tom Delargy (@derekrootboy) October 12, 2016

Don't see the problem here, Stop the War are a peerless organisation when it comes to opposing illegal wars. https://t.co/Z8vdvSiYZz

— CorbynFan (@CorbynSuperFan) October 12, 2016

Stop the War is yet to respond to a request for comment.

Close

What's Hot